The amount of mobbing during development
tends to be inversely proportional to the amount of mobbing needed during outages.
»tends to be inversely proportional to the amount of mobbing needed during outages.
»…which decreases transaction cost, which enables even smaller batches, which means (even more) co-creation.
»
What if we shift thinking from
“everyone focus on finishing what they’re doing”
to
“everyone helping each other finish what they’re doing”?
I see people having to beg others to review their PR.
»I tend to advocate for very small SUTs when (unit) testing (a.k.a. micro-tests).
»The slower the test suite, the less often we’ll run it, the more we’ll backtrack whenever we make a wrong turn in the code, the slower we’ll go at the end.
»Up until this point I was thinking that tests, as a safety net, help us to extend MTBF of the system. Just figured out that they actually help us with MTTR. But a different kind.
»“To achieve wealth optimize for minimizing losses over maximizing gains”
»Try building quality in by shifting left on the collaboration. Instead of mobbing on the outage, mob during the development. Diversity of thoughts, needed skills and system understanding builds the quality in.
»